For the paper:
You will turn in a paper at the end of Week 7 which will consist of 7-10 pages regarding a sport entrepreneur of your choice (approved by me prior to submission of actual paper). This paper will discuss the life and business venture that the person of your choice has taken on. An example would be Michael Jordan’s vast entrepreneurial ventures after his successful basketball career, Mark Cuban, Jerry Jones, or someone less popular or maybe more local to you.
Your paper will judged on originality, description of the entrepreneurial ventures of the person of your choice. The person does not have to be a sport celebrity, but can be someone who started a sport business.
I will also check for proper APA format, citations, and references. You must have at least 10 sources from the Internet and/or professional journals.
Due DateNov 8, 2020 11:55 PMHide Rubrics
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaExcellentGoodFairPoorDid not attemptCriterion ScoreFoundation of Knowledge25 points
Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows a superior level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.
Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in the assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.
Student exhibits a general and average understanding of subject matter throughout the assignment. Student provides an average ability in relating course content in examples given. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.
Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.
Did not attempt
/ 25Synthesis of Knowledge20 points
Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Topic is clearly defined and thesis is well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.
Student establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the assignment. Student demonstrates an effective presentation with most support statements helping to illustrate the key focus of assignment.
Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. Some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
Student exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
Did not attempt
/ 20Application of Knowledge20 points
Student demonstrates a high level of critical thinking necessary for completing this assignment. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.
Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment and includes numerous formatting errors. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.
Did not attempt
/ 20Writing Skills25 points
Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned, error-free assignment that reflects student’s ability to prepare graduate-level writing. APA formatting guidelines followed with no errors in citations. Incorporates the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment directions.
Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and presents an above-average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3 grammatical errors. Student provides a good final product that covers the above-minimal requirements. APA format; 1-2 errors in citation. May or may not incorporate the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment direct
Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but with more than 4 grammatical errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. APA format, but with several omissions and with more than 2 errors in citation. May or may not incorporate the minimum number of acceptable references per the assignment directions.
Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment. Several grammatical errors. APA format not used and errors throughout paper & citations. Lack of appropriate references or source materials. The paper is not of acceptable quality based on assignment expectations.
Did not attempt
/ 25Organization of Ideas/Format10 points
Studentthoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment follows directions and includes an appropriate introduction, well-developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan, and be organized in a logical sequence.
Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors, and by generally following directions.
Student applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing and did not follow directions in one or more sections of the assignment.
Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms and does not follow directions.
Did not attempt
/ 10Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 100
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more